Great job this week! Rachel, Robbie, Ben, and Jordi really enjoyed discussing the posts.
First, some compliments:
- Good job taking in the feedback from last week by improving your titles and generating some really great discussions through your comments
- Great job adding multimedia to your blog posts
- Blogs this week were engaging and did a great job of generating conversation
- Overall, really creative use of examples from pop-culture and how they intersect with our class discussions
Now, some feedback and food for thought:
- We thought that the class did a really good job of writing about topics that interested them and this showed. However, we think that posts could have benefited with a more clear connection to the class throughout the blog post (as opposed to only at the end). We think this could have been accomplished with use of a thesis statement at the introduction.
- We were hoping for a broader selection of prompt topics by the class: lots of people posted about TV shows, but no one wrote about music or books. Try to view some of your classmates posts before creating your own so we generate a diverse range of topics in the future.
- The posts this week generated some really interesting discussion on plot-spoilers: the ethics of plot spoiling, when is it ok or not ok to discuss a plot line. What do you guys think about the ethics of plot spoiling? Consider tv shows vs. movies, Dramas vs Comedies.
Wall of Fame:
Our favorite posts:
Our favorite use of multimedia:
Most engaging comments:
Are people innately ethical or unethical? Or are people’s ethics swayed by the situation they find themselves in?
Lets look at Walter White and Saul Goodman from Breaking Bad and Better Caul Saul to answer the question.
Better Call Saul is a new spin-off to the very popular Breaking Bad series aired on AMC. Vince Gilligan’s new hit is the prequel to the Breaking Bad series that details the life of Saul Goodman before meeting Walter White. For those of you who haven’t watched the original series and are planning to, I will try not to spoil it for you by providing only a brief overview. The main character is Walter White, (known as Heisenberg) a chemistry teacher who is diagnosed with Stage III cancer and given only 2 years to live. In a conversation with his wife’s brother-in-law who is a DEA agent, Walter White learns about the money involved in the drug world during a bust. Deciding he has nothing to lose and wanting to leave money behind for his handicapped son, wife, and newborn baby – he embarks on a career of drugs and crime. He uses his chemistry background to create and sell the finest crystal meth. The series tracks Walter White as he transforms from a regular chemistry schoolteacher into a ruthless kingpin in the drug trade. Walter White ends up hiring “Saul Goodman” as his lawyer who advises him and helps him launder money. Saul Goodman is a crooked criminal lawyer who is in on the drug ring, putting his own life at risk for the money. The prequel highlights Saul Goodman’s career as a lawyer before meeting Walter.
Walter White – “I have Lived under the threat of death.. because of that I’ve made choices, I alone should suffer the consequences of those choices”.
I think the reason many of us were so intrigued by Breaking Bad was because of the transformation of Walter White into Heisenberg. The series unraveled a family man with values into a notorious drug dealer. As a professor and scholar, he followed consequentialism, weighing the consequences of his actions. However, he considered himself a dead man and had nothing to lose. The negative consequences did not overrule his family’s future welfare. But what prompted this moral breakdown? Was Walter White always unethical? Or did the situation he found himself force him to make unethical choices out of desperation to support his family? I think we can agree that Walter White was a man of values at the start of the film; no one could have expected this from him. In life and death situations, like the one Walter found himself in, do ethical principles change? What would you have done? Even good people like Walter become desperate, feel like they have nothing to lose, and do unthinkable things. But is the fear of death a good enough excuse? Once Walter decided to do this, was there no return? He had countless opportunities to put the drug dealer lifestyle in his past but decided not to, spiraling down a path of pure immorality. Does the first unethical choice justify the next unethical choice?
On the other hand there is Saul Goodman. Equally as unethical as Walter White himself, however, the new series gives us a look at his life before teaming up with him. Better Call Saul gives us a better look at this crooked lawyer and how he came about. Even though it seems that he too, like Walter, went down the path of immorality out of the situation he found himself in. During the first episodes, it shows that he was broke and barely had any money to cover his expenses. He teams up with a couple of skateboarders who are trying to scam people by being hit by cars. Did his financial situation force him to do this out of desperation? Perhaps, but in a later episode we learn that Saul has done this since he was a kid. They called him “Slippin Jimmy” because he would collect insurance claims from purposely slipping on ice. Saul has never been ethical but rather has abused the law for his personal gain. Can someone like Saul ever become ethical? Or has his rap sheet altered his perception of what is good and what is bad? Does it just take one unethical choice to send people like Saul and Walter down a path of immorality? If you break a moral code once, what will stop you from doing it again?